Skip to content

Dennis Aftermath: 120 MPH wsn’t so bad, was it?

I see a lot of reporting this morning about Hurricane Dennis. Some of the stores have the tone that “this storm wasn’t as bad as it could have been,” comparing the 120 MPH Dennis with last year’s stronger Ivan. Dennis came ashore about 50 miles east of the Ivan trike point near Pensacola, and apparently moved through more rural areas, minimizing the damage.

But as one weather forecaster commented in something I read yesterday, getting hit by a 120 MPH Dennis versus a 145 MPH Ivan is like choosing between being hit by an 18-wheel truck and a freight train.

One more thing I’ll never understand: why do the Weather Channel and many local TV stations insist on having some poor on-scene reporter standing out on a street bordering the beach as the front the hurricane’s eyewall comes ashore? I watched a videotape report from such a fellow yesterday. The wind was literally lifting him off his feet, he could barely speak from the pressure of the wind and rain, and you could see the occasional projectile roll by as a sign or branch or shingle was ripped from it’s moorings. Of course, the person you don’t see is the poor cameraman/woman, who’s not only trying to stay upright, but trying to do so while holding a heavy object on his or her shoulder. No glory there.

We all know how dangerous these storms are. Human sacrifices are unnecessary. If you must videotape the landfall, try anchoring a camera to the roof of a building and let the reporter do a blow-by-blow account remotely from the nearest sound building. Or the next state. In fact, why is narration even necessary? We all know what’s up: high damaging winds, sideways-moving rain, big surf, storm surge. This is like watching the Yule Log on television: what’s there to narrate? There’s a log in the fireplace, and it’s burning.

{ 1 } Comments

  1. Juan Paxety | 7/11/2005 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    I worked in TV news for years. To understand, you need a hit of background – when a news director considers hiring a reporter he glances at the written resume, but pays a lot of attention to the resume tape – a tape of previous stories the reporter has done at other stations.

    Thus, the reporter in the hurricane is not on camera for the enjoyment of the viewer at home. The reporter is on camera in the wind and rain so that he will have video for his resume tape. It will probably be the first thing the on the tape.

    A reporter is on TV for two reasons – first, to be on TV – second, to make a good resume tape.